"but bearded bruce appeared to believe the hebrew text supported aeons of time."

I stated that the words used in the older version of the Bible refer to a period of time, not a period of 24 hours. Thus, the Bible is NOT in conflict with evolution, which does not address
what part God may or may not have in natural selection.

Only those that are unaware of the meaning of what is claimed ( not specifically by me) to be God's Word would use a false reading of the text to support a claim against evolution.

And if they are unaware of this point, what else are they wrong about in their reading of the Bible? Are they more interested in supporting a viewpoint, or understanding what God had ( supposedly) stated?