NOT "whose behaviour indicates that he "does not seem to be Islamic"
The article said he drank, smoked and went with women - the full profile of him in the News Review section of the paper confirms this. I did not quote verbatim, I took a part of it as a quick example - I had no access to a link to pass on, as I always try to do when I quote articles
Do not accuse me of your tricks of doctoring texts - I neither do it nor feel the need to do it. I don't take part to score points and I don't post under a false name to give myself support. Also unlike you, I have no axe to grind, no terrorist states or organiations top support.
I look on these discussions as an exchange of information and opinions - not an ego trip.
"You attempted to tell a deliberate lie,"
The "deliberate lie" was that Britain supplied small arms ammunition to Syria - " the sale was documented, yet yopu continued to deny its existence (I settled on small missiles for killing at your insistence". You presented seven contradiciting explanations of the order - Keith finally settled on "I thought you were talking about Libya".
All three of you, including Weirdie Beardie, claimed I had supported Hamas and other terrorist groups and when you failed to find proof, you ignored all requests to withdraw what was an obvious lie.
Want me to repeat what you said about my mother ( dead over forty years now)
This type of lying shit is what makes debating with maggots like you less than worthless; at least you can disagree with other forum members and not come away feeling you need to take a shower.
"A stated factually the situation of Breivik."
No - you have continued to ignore the fact that has coonstantly been pointed out to you that the Norwegian government had changed their minds and had virtually decided to try him as a criminal.
That is as good as lying.
Never mind though - you obviously still have Bluesman on your side - and what more could a girl want!!
Jim Carroll