banjo ray.i did,t see the programme but it would be interesting to know why the ice cores "plainly show" 9000 years.certainly an interpretation of the data based on assumptions about the evidence might suggest that.i do know that rocks are often dated variously and i have heard that rock formed in recent years by volcanic action has been dated as millenia old!
i did read an interesting article on creation.com called "the lost sqaudron".planes that crash landed on greenland ice were eventually found and one painstakingly recovered and restored in the 1980s i think.what surprised the recovery team was that they were 250 ft under the ice and 3 mile removed from the crash.what i wonder is;if they done an ice bore there how many years would they calculate if they knew not that the planes were there?.
pete