operational science is observable,testable,repeatable.evolutionism is not.the only way that the the claim to being otherwise can be posited is to appeal to natural selection which is observable only within the limits of its kind.
this was one of the
"evidences"presented on the tv show.was it mendel and rice development?so natural selection works on rice[or whatever the details were] and new varieties developed.it was still rice at the end of it.
that is no evidence for microbes to mudcatters evolution.
i seem to remember the presenter suggesting apes were our nearest kin based on "similar" body shape.all this is interpretation of the data and IMO a weak argument .
but the story line from first life to higher lifeforms was presented without any evidence-just the confident account of how it was supposed to have happened.
darwin expressed confidence that the fossil record would produce transitional chains but after all these years and probably tons of fossils there aint much to validate that hope but a few debatable items.
if there were any "evidences" i missed please post and we can discuss them and apologies if my memory failed on any details. pete