Bert ~~ You are still begging the same question - as to what shall be defined as a 'crime'. You over there denounce as a 'crime' something done elsewhere which would be illegal if done in your territory, but is not against the laws of the place where it happens to be done. I ask again, how can any action be a crime which is not against the law in the country where it takes place? You sneered at the poster above who made the following point, but it is very pertinent ~~ i.e., to follow your logic, you should extradite all our 18-20 year-olds who drink in pubs, as they are legally allowed to do in our primitive and unenlightened realm, for breaking your minimum-age drinking laws. Can you not get it into your thick head that our laws are not identical, and what is 'criminal' there is not necessarily so here? The principle of de minimis non curat lex, to hear you tell it, should be no inhibition here.