"seems to me that scientists when they affirm darwinism are doing the same as creationists"

As I said back in February, here is the difference between scientists and creationists - falsifiability.

I will state quite explicitly the evidence required to make me change my position RE creation vs. evolution:

If current theories of evolution are incorrect, I need to see an exposure of a single sedimentary layer -- a single parting in one formation -- that exposes a trilobite, a dinosaur, and a human. If you can point me to this, I will completely change my view. (I would need only two out of three of the fossils to seriously question evolution).

Now it is your turn. What evidence would falsify your belief in YEC?

Please state with a specificity approximating mine above.

If you cannot (or refuse to, or duck the question), then you have demonstrated the clear difference between science and creationism.