We might as well be asking, "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" and pretending to have a rational debate about it.

Once again, for the umpteenth time:
*Honest process of investigation for which the result has not been previously decided upon and data then cherry-picked to support the "conclusion."
*Reproducible results.

None of that here from the evolution nay-sayers. So a question to them: How do you run your lives, make decisions on what to do, and when, how, and with whom? What *process* of reasoning and problem-solving do you use?

Ah, fuggit. I am sure I will not get anything vaguely representing an intelligent response.

So then, how many angels *can* dance on the head of a pin?

Saul