so don you say there are no scientists who are creationists who are qualified to debate dawkins!?
you are a likeable bloke but look out for low flying buttermoths!.
as to ayotollah taunts;-seems i need to remind you again that darwin believers have done much more damage in recent history than centuries of creationist christians.

steve is asking for evidence that evolution [GTE]knowing that if i venture anything it can be dismissed by ref to my lack of learning.
so i will let evolutionists assess.

"evolution a theory universally accepted not because it can be proven......but because the only alternative,special creation is clearly incredible"    dms watson.

"the more an animal type has lost through this process of progressive subtraction,the less there remains for the production of mutants which will be capable of existence"

"given the fact of evolution,one would expect the fossils to document a gradual steady change from ancestral forms to the descendants.but this is not what the paleontologist finds.instead,he or she finds gaps in just about every phyletic series"    ernst mayr   2001

tbc....

so steve what is your best evidence FOR darwinism?
regards   pete.

.