A good start to understanding, Pete, would be to ditch the meaningless terms "Evolutionist" and "Darwinist".

There are no such animals. They are scientists my friend, and they run on reproducible evidence, not-pie-in-the-sky.

""if i were afraid of the supposed facts of the GTE i would not be subjecting myself to your arguments;-though they mostly consist of assertions.i am generalising here since some bring some data interpretation eg pennys geology.""

No Pete, they do not mostly consist of assertions. They consist of conclusions backed by evidence from reproducible experiment which gives consistent results leading directly to those conclusions.

And Penny's Geology which you cite is a case (though not the only one) in point. It completely destroys your claim that the Earth is 6000 years old. Yet you still cling to that assertion, for that is what an assertion is, a claim unsupported by experimental scientific evidence.

If nothing else, you now know the difference between "conclusion" and "assertion".

Now all that is needed is to teach you the difference of process between:

Science........Obtain experimental evidence and draw conlusions therefrom.

and Creationism......Make assertion and adjust facts to fit. If all else fails, LIE!

Don T.