well bill;i assume the many new experiments have not obtained their objective ,and whatever may have been achieved still has matter and human effort to facilitate however much is.
in the meantime we still have something rather than nothing,which IMO is what would [not] be if there were no cause sufficient.and in this i have every right to believe the revelation of a self existent,eternal creator is as valid as you to believe it has some unexplained cause.simple science so far still posits that anything existing has to have a sufficient cause -last i heard!.
is utter nothing a sufficient cause?