"the Senate "super majority" rule that rewards the minority over the majority.."
?????
"Im saying with the "Blue Dogs" that the Dems, at the very best, had a shaky and quite disconnected "super majority"

So Democrats had a super majority and were able to pass anything they wanted.

You can use your IF Then hypothetical logical fallacies to try to prove otherwise but the actual truth about whether they could have passed a bill can not be known unless it was voted on. But they did not even try. Now you make lame excuses about why they did not act and try to blame it on Republicans.

Even when more Democrats than Republicans voted for TARP, you want to blame it on Republicans. Even when more Republicans than Democrats voted against TARP you want to blame TARP on Republicans. Even it Obama voted for TARP and said it was a necessary thing to do, you want to blame TARP on Republicans.

The Democratic party had a super majority from April of 2009 when Senator Arlen Specter decided to switch from a Republican to a Democrat until February 4, 2010 when Scott Brown was sworn in.

Now do you want to dispute this fact with more whiney, false logic Bobert "facts"?