The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #146399 Message #3389650
Posted By: Little Hawk
13-Aug-12 - 12:31 PM
Thread Name: BS: Is Hillary Clinton Insane?
Subject: RE: BS: Is Hillary Clinton Insane?
Is Hillary insane? Hard to say...but she is working on behalf of an insane imperial order with insane objectives, so being insane would sort of go well with the job, wouldn't it?
The plans to turn the entirety of North Africa and the Middle East and the Caspian-Afghan region into a foreign-controlled Anglo-American-Israeli oil industry fiefdom were being made a long time ago, even well before George Bush was elected. Those plans were part of the PNAC group who were planning for a "New American Century" to be established in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union. No "Peace Dividend" was to be ours after the fall of Communism, folks! Instead, we were going to get some brand new wars with a brand new concocted "enemy", Islamic Fundamentalism, to replace the old Communist enemy.
A key part of defeating the Soviets was to ally with and promote the most extreme Muslim fundamentalist fighters of all kinds and use them to defeat the Russians in Afghanistan, destabilize the southernmost parts of the Soviet Union where there are significant Muslim populations and other ethnic minorities who could be encouraged to revolt against the Soviets. Those plans worked perfectly in the 80s and resulted in the Russians losing their war in Afghanistan and losing their Warsaw Pact empire and suffering national bankruptcy. That was just Part 1 of what the men in the PNAC had in mind.
Further objectives after that were to destabilize and destroy any independent secular Arab states which were at all capable of challenging Israel, hopefully balkanize them and weaken them so that they became hollow shells. The primary secular Arab states in this respect were Iraq, Lybia, and Syria. This required launching a number of overt wars...or covert "revolutions" orchestrated and financed and armed by the West and its client governments and partners in the Middle East, the most significant of those being Saudi Arabia.
Basically, it amounted to this: you either cooperated very closely with Anglo-American oil objectives and military objectives (as the Saudis, Egyptians, and some of the Gulf States have done)...or you were a target to be destroyed either through outright invasion, as in the case of Iraq and Afghanistan, or through fomenting and arming foreign-backed rebellions, as in the case of Lybia and now Syria.
This resulted in the West repeatedly arming and promoting the very worst kind of Muslim extremists and Jihadists that it claims it is fighting against.
That's what was done in Lybia. That's what is being done in Syria. Every form of tribal and religious division is taken advantage of during these western-orchestrated "rebellions", because the easiest way to conquer any state is to foment internal strife between its different sects, tribes, and other separate cultural groups.
None of it is being done for humanitarian or democratic reasons, it is being done in order to secure absolute control of that whole region by the Anglo-American-Israeli Axis....and that is, of course, a direct threat to the future interests of Russia, China, Iran, and all the Muslim populations in that entire region. The effect of all this has been utterly disastrous for most Muslim populations.
Not surprisingly, the Russians and Chinese, who know perfectly well what is going on, have somewhat belatedly decided to draw the line in Syria, and not cooperate any further with what the West is doing.
The ultimate target of the game is Iran. They are the final piece to be taken in the Great Game, but the West wants to destroy the power of Syria first before moving on Iran.
The stakes are incredibly high and extremely dangerous in this new Great Game, because it is risking the provocation of an all-out Third World War with nuclear-armed Russia and China. There's a point where the Russians and Chinese will say "no more" and they will fight. It may come over Syria. It may come over Iran. The Russians and Chinese are both engaged in a large military build-up and modernization of their forces to prepare for the unthinkable...because it is looking more inevitable with each passing year.
It shouldn't be happening and it never should have been contemplated in the first place. It's a mad plan. Since Hillary is uttering mad propaganda on behalf of a mad plan, yeah...she does come across as a bit insane.
And by the way, the biggest phony act in that entire mad plan occurred on Sept. 11, 2001...staged as a provocation to get the American and western populations to give their moral support to a series of mad and totally unjustifiable wars in the Middle East. That was our version of the Reichstag Fire. It worked brilliantly, and we are seeing its dreadful legacy in the destruction of our domestic democratic traditions and the march of a new and utterly criminal imperial order across the world.
And I live INSIDE part of the territory of that imperial order. It's pretty depressing, let me tell you. I feel like I was living in Germany around about 1938 or thereabouts.
I have no hope for either the Democratic or Republican parties to deliver us out of this trap, because they both work toward the same foreign policy objectives. They differ a bit here and there on domestic policy, but when it comes to foreign policy what they will give you is WAR. And my own country's government (Canadian) works in harmony with their purposes.
Hillary's mad because the Russians and Chinese are digging in their heels and not just meekly letting the West have it ALL without lifting a finger.
Well....Hitler got pretty mad when France and Britain finally stood up in 1939 and said "NO" too. Fascists just hate it when people refuse to meekly surrender to their glorious New World Order and their TRIUMPH OF THE WILL.
What difference will my words make to all of this? None. Just like the rest of you. But we talk because it is our nature to talk while we still can. It's part of being free. The question is, would I be better off just keeping my mouth shut and avoiding the attention of other people about this stuff?
Yeah, probably.
That's why I very often type a post somewhat like this one...look at it...and then hit the "back" button, causing it to vanish into cyberspace forever and never be read by anyone else at Mudcat Cafe. I can live a more peaceful life that way. I can avoid getting drawn into pointless, unpleasant political wrangles online with various people I'll never meet.
I might just do that with this post. I might disapper it. Or I might not. If I don't, you may get to read it.
And it still won't matter. Don't imagine that I want to argue with you about any of it, because I don't. I much prefer not arguing with other people. After all, would I put a little poison in my food each day if I didn't have to?