Dan's point 'seems' to be.. "I can't help all the crazy people out there abusing the system, but I can help control the space immediately around myself."

If that is it, he has a certain kind of logic.... but obviously, all the places where we can't deploy Dan clones still make headlines.

MY point is that because we can't clone enough good guys...(and couldn't feed 'em if we cold clone 'em).. we really need some way to reduce guns AND/OR access to guns, 'cause we sure ain't gonna reduce crazy people.

Gnu still notes that "...you antis and you haven't got shit done for YEARS!".... and I agree... but us 'antis' have kept trying. When we depend on useful laws, and politicians who write laws are in hock to the NRA, it's kinda like asking colleges to ban football because kids get hurt- there's just too much money involved from alumni.

Maybe if some buys an AK-47 legally and shoots up the NRA offices?
naawwww... they'd just call that a good example of why they need guns.

Maybe if ........... *sigh* I dunno...

(4-5 shooting incidents around my area (DC metro) every week)