I saw that on line earlier, ragdall. I believe the case involved sprouts or salad ingredients, that have been known to be an issue?
To me, the government epidemologist was speaking somewhat like a lawyer (best to completly avoid everything could possibly present a problem) and (again, IMO) his candid statements seem to be "at odds" with many other scientists.

IMO, it seems much easier to make public statements when it involves a small industry sector (with little clout), rather than taking shots at a huge one - who will use various routes to "slap you around" with lawyers and complaints (and threats) to politicians.