I find it both amusing and a little sick that someone who would come into a forum with a self-introduction such as IARF... and then complain about "bad language" and extend worry about "gentle readers". This is obviously just *my* opinion.

And while I didn't mind transcribing Londons Ordinary to the best of my ability...I would also point out that implying that the time of the members of this forum is less valuable then IARF's time really isn't a very political way of asking for help.

Then there is the claim that the words of the original broadside don't scan well enough...

IARF is functioning as one of the more obvious types of web "trolls"; whether by intent, natural incination or for some unknown reason. My reaction is "play with fire, expect to get burned" - and also that if you spray fuel on a lit flame, don't blame the fire if bystanders get hurt.