"Scientists question the review's design, findings and interpretation -- including an alleged downplay of the higher levels of omega-3's, as well as lower levels of pesticide residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria found in organic compared to conventional foods.

There are also suspicions that Stanford downplayed the benefits of organic foods because they had received large donations from conventional agriculture giant Cargill."

Stanford Organics Study: Have Faulty Methods, Political Motivations Threatened Kids' Health?