"Since the initial guess is twice as likely to be incorrect as correct,..."

Embarrassed? Me? Not in the least. In YOUR statement as just quoted, you change the parameters of the arguement of logic in an absolutely illogical fashion.

YOU put YOUR paramenters on YOUR thought where NONE exist in order to prove YOUR point and tell ME I MUST DO THE SAME and then call me "a poor chap" who should be embarassed?

I have tried to explain this in the MOST simple of terms but it appears to me... well, it appears that because I don't deal with anything but the facts at hand that I am correct. No ifs, ands or buts... Me? I don't need any. If you do....

gnightgnu