DMcG... "I suspect gnu is either teasing us or, despite his protestations otherwise, finds it difficult to change from his original opinion. For example, gnu has not responded to the post from BK Lick @ 01 Nov 12 - 04:17 AM as far as I can tell.rom his original opinion."

Addressed, quite adequately and VERY truthfully I might add, except for BK Lick's post. I dunno why you think I am supposed to respond to that post. It seems obvious that he addressed it to you. Did you respond? If not, why not?

After all, this IS a discussion about logic and reason and truth. What you write is what you get.

BK... "What gnu needs is clarification, not mystification."

You gotta be shittin me.

JotSC, re his response re "rules".... "Perhaps I should have written, 'Yes, but...'. The "but" or "buts" have been noted several times in the past week."

No shit eh? "But" just don't cut the grass. Facts cuts the grass.

Those ARE the rules. PERIOD. FULL STOP. NObody but me seems to fully grasp this simple ruse. Some even think I am mystified and some cast aspersions upon my intelligence and, far worse, upon my character. Yup, I AM mystified. But it's not because *I* don't understand a simple parlour game invented far before that great Canuck, Monty Hall, was even born, in order to entertain children.

There are only two doors. Ask Monty.