If you are looking for "Science as Entertainment" or if you are interested in stretching your mind with a series of "What Ifs", you might find the site interesting. If you are looking for whether or not people dug hundreds of miles of tunnels, this is not the place to find a definitive answer. There are no links to sites where you can see corroborating results. If the ideas here fit your prejudices, you can feel reassured but anyone with a sense of how to go about the often uncomfortable business of critical thinking realizes that when you find new information that reinforces the position you already hold or one that you find reassuring, you need to question it all the more. Unfortunately, at this point, without further information, this item fails that test. It seems too much like an earlier disappointment, von Daniken.I once had the opportunity to work with the inventor of sidescan sonar which allows equipment to "see" underground and I know something about its potential. When I read thi "Story", I was initially excited. It seemed possible that such exploration could have been done and perhaps it was even kept secret until it became necessary to expose it due to a nuclear weapons treat negotiation but as I read in, it set off more warnings and alarm bells. Too many references to fringe beliefs in a search for credibility rather than to sources that would be transfixed by this sort of information. Careers could be built on this, an overthrow of what was once common belief. THe person who could make a case that would convince even a few of the more open-minded peole working in this fieldwoud find he had opened floodgates in the desert) of ideas. I hope there is some truthto this story but until I l;earn more I remain
(A disappointed)Sourdough