Well thank you!...(Takes a bow)....because if it stimulated an interpretation.....the perception is in the reader....I did not offer an interpretation, and then comes the question to you, "Why did I automatically perceive it this way?"
I know my examples we 'far less than precise, for every step"....but the concept (minus all the centuries) is there...and even Darwin wrestled with it....but following the 'theory', we CAN play it out and 'bottom line it'!

Besides, IF man has evolved, shouldn't his intelligence capacity grow with it..? ..or did we lose something else? ..maybe certain response to instinct?.... maybe being tuned in on a little higher frequency for communication...maybe not...but the fact remains, the next step for man in the evolutionary process is going to include overcoming death in this form, that we know as 'normal'....fair enough?

....then why were the first aquatics, evolving to be on land?
If you have a theory..play it out both ways....and of course ask "WHY".....and be open for the input.

Do you think that man has 'evolved' beyond listening to his instincts... to even detect that changes are being made?...and to adapt..and use his brain in the processing of ALL the input?..so it's not all unconscious....?.......maybe somewhere the two get better acquainted...and be aware of a larger picture?....
The possibilities are wide open.....and that's not even saying evolution or creation is the 'one'...or maybe both happened...maybe not...

GfS