The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #147391   Message #3438207
Posted By: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
18-Nov-12 - 11:30 AM
Thread Name: BS: Alternative to Science??
Subject: RE: BS: Alternative to Science??
Didn't mean to 'confuse' you, Musket...you take it that I'm a strict 'creationist'..and that came from the medieval times...wrong on both counts. The Biblical account of 'creation' was written thousands of years before the medieval period...(you can check that out yourself)...and the premise I laid out in my post,

"Subject: RE: BS: Alternative to Science??
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 17 Nov 12 - 04:23 PM "

uses evolution as the premise, not creation, and points out a few questions worthy of thinking about....or at least to answer, in regards to where we are at now.

To say man is nothing more than a physical being, in turn, must encompass MORE than thought of, in relation to intelligence, love and a few other 'unseen' phenomenon, that we as humans seem to have access. To say that these 'unseen' attributes do not exist, is the premise for human chaos..because it is one of the common traits found in every culture, from industrialized countries to aboriginal societies. It is when these attributes are either violated or ignored to we see the 'injustice' of it all for our fellow humans..by the way, where did we get that sense of injustice?
It has been noted that humans void of these attributes become self-centered psychopaths, who do offenses to their fellow man, without ANY cognizant empathy, or remorse for their behavior.
Those who Do tap into it, in like fashion have performed some of the greatest deeds to benefit mankind as a whole......go figure.
If we were to follow your model of human behavior, everything would be in an upheaval, and that would be just fine..because there is nothing higher, to inspire or correct us with.
Could it be that our minds are just 'modems' tapping into a higher collective consciousness? Does a higher form of intelligence even exist?...and if it was comprised of love, don't you think it would be open to being communicated with?
...oh yeah, we can't prove there is love...or intelligence...nor that it is part of a larger living being....which comprises the WHOLE...unless, of course one wishes to exclude themselves...but would that mean they don't have access to love, or intelligence?

Would it be futile to suggest, "Think about it?"

GfS