a lot of the evolutionist talk consists of assertions,appeals to authority or downright mockery.as i have said before-argument weak,shout like blazes. lack of understanding due to lack of explanation is supposed to be cured by extensive reading of darwin,dawkin,j gould etc.if i,m asked what the bible says about something i can mostly tell someone and give the ref,but if i ask about something in their sacred text i just get told to read it-eg where is the mechanism explained in origins or elsewhere for the information increase that facilitates increasing higher lifeforms?
admittedly evotheory is so complex[not to mention flexible]that it may be difficult for its followers to give explanations understandable to the layman.or maybe thats to their advantage!
i was amused gfs by your challenge about half and half transitions but in fairness it is not what they now say.mind you the 40yr long half and half hoax was accepted gladly by darwinists back then!