Aren't we touchy?

Evolution is the subject at the moment. Perhaps I should have said, "might possibly, conceivably, and without flying in the face any absolute supercosmic law of ineffable existence that anyone is aware of, be guided."   

When the most highly educated theologians of every faith concede in principle that Darwin was right, it certainly makes the Creationist position look...well, choose an adjective.

Particularly since the theologians can't logically be charged with being slaves to atheistical, hubristic science.

By the way, I'm still waiting for a reply to yesterday's Big Question, "Is the Cosmos a Just a Con Game?" and please explain your answer.