"some scientists focus in on 'in nature'..as in 'natural'..and cataloging the changes found therein.....others focus more on the 'force in'...and they look to the 'unseen'..or even 'above nature' or 'super-natural'. they are both valid studies, ..."

What ridiculous nonsense! Just give me ONE example of a 'study' of the supernatural which qualifies as valid science!! As I pointed out in the 'afterlife' thread, people who claim to study the supernatural always turn out to be cranks, charlatans or madmen. You can allow yourself to be fooled into believing in ghosts, fairies and boogeymen (and God?), and feel "akin" to such nonsense, if you want to, GfS, but don't confuse such rubbish with science!