"It is not wikipedia; "
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/Zionism_def_history.html

Crouch behind an "Antisemitism" defence if it helps you avoid facing the fact that you are now part and parcel of Keith's little army, despite having said..... "Knowing this, I can't see how even Keith et al can go on expressing support for them".
If you can show that I have anywhere shown "hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group", feel free to do so. My argument, and the argument of many Jews I know, or whose writings I read, is with the Israeli regime and its human rights record, particularly on its murderous treatment of civilians. The greatest contribution to Antisemitism over the last half century has been from the Israeli leadership and their supporters.
What was it the man (should have) said, "the last refuge of a scoundrel is the accusation of Antisemitism"
Your behaviour on this subject has been as spineless as Keith's has been mindlessly irrational - he has continued to deny or ignore the facts placed before him, while you have defended his arguments and attempted to protect him from their consequences from the safety of your bunker - a support for Israeli atrocities by proxy.
He has proved nothing, he has answered nothing, his has been a blind defence of atrocities that have been put before him over and over again, which he as chosen, and still chooses to ignore.
I am tempted to write "and then there were two", but this has not been a case of Keith winning your support for his arguments; it has been blindingly obvious that you were there all the time
Jim Carroll