""I guess if you don't think that is what the scientist found, because of your particular bone-hardheadedness, I guess you just don't believe science...and use the outdated science to stand on!""

You've misunderstood mate!

I have no argument with what he thinks he found, none at all. He is entitled to his own hallucinations.

What I object to is his being described as a scientist. Whatever his scientific qualifications might be, he did nothing whatever in a scientific way.

He drew solid conclusions from absolutely NO scientifically derived or testable evidence, and claimed as a result a breakthrough which fails on so many levels that it would be dimissed by the majority of imbeciles, let alone rational thinking human beings.

Don T.