Don,

Sure--influencing remote devices such as done by Ingo Swann in lab experiments in 1972. Consistently acheiving above chance results on remote viewing experiments as was done repeatedly in Hal Puthoff's experimental series for Stanford Research Institute in the late 70's. The case of the red tennie that was detected during one patient's OOB experience which nobody in the hospital knew about, which was parked out of sight on a ledge above her hospital room window, not visible from the window, or the street. These are just a few--I have provided a lot of links in other threads..

But the insistence on "scientific" corroboration as being material evidence is problematic since it like asking the fox to count the hens. I am sure this seems hard to understand but it is inherent in the business. Domination ny force is the earmartk of the material universe. It tends to nullify anything not willing to buy the package, such as live thought, awareness, live communication, creativity, and so on.

Given the very large number of people who have reported such experiences, and the very large number of people who have reported none, I don't see a strong argument for merit of the latter rather than the former. Furthermore you are facing a white-crow logic problem while hoping that all crows are always black.

A