.steve formerly asserts that no evolutionary scientist will admit the failure of theory,so i thought that quote was ideal.
of course,-shown to be wrong-resort to insults [as usual]

bill- you can always accuse creationists of quote mining and i,m sure you are right.there is a quite extensive seam to dig from
heres another-
"research on the origin of life seems to be unique in that the conclusion has already been authoritavely accepted...what remains to be done is to find the scenarios which describe the detailed mechanisms and processes by which this has happened"
hubert yockey. information theorist.
journal of theoretical biology 67:377-378 1987

you mistake me if you think i lump all scientists together.i have previously said that operational science is not the same as origins research.the latter contains what i would describe as fundamentalist darwinians - as per the above quote.i dont accept that such do follow the evidence wherever it leads and the behaviour of some posters demonstates such intransigence,dont you think!?.
no "proof" was shown me but i became convinced that God did exist as i explained back then."proof" as you know is beyond us - either way!
true i am not the academic you are but many who have changed their mind are,eg antony flew ,on consideration of the complexity of dna

happy christmas to all posters    pete.