Don T.
Your earlier post which mentioned "there have been Sikh and Hindu victims" is so dismissive as to beggar belief in its obvious implication that this was almost unworthy of mention.

C.S. was the first to give it something like its true import as the origin of later abuse of white girls

It was not dismissive, it was me reporting a fact, in correction of something Akeneaton had posted.
In the 2011 thread I posted quotes from Hindu and Sikh authorities condemning the abuse of their girls by BP men, and thereafter included them in my lists of evidence.

It did not precede the abuse of white girls, it was concurrent.