Your excuses for not replying to simple questions are really not worth responding to - if you can't understand what people say to you, or dispute it with rational argument, stop dominating and filibusting threads - these are not complicated subjects - massacring unarmed non combatants is unacceptable whoever does it, and using the behaviour of others to excuse it is utterly dishonest and makes you part of those war crimes and human rights abuses, just as those who knew about the Holocaust and did nothing allowed themselves to become part of it.
If there's anything here you don't understand, please point it out and I'll try to explain it in the 'soundbite size' postings' that you seem to favour, otherwise, stop pretending you don't understand what is being said.
Claiming my arguments are un"reasonable" or ir"rational" without "reasonable" or "rational" arguments of your own really is scraping the bottom of the barrel - PATHETIC AND MEANINGLESS, to say the least.
STOP BEING AN APOLOGIST FOR WAR CRIMINALS.
You claim to have disputed evidence put forward of Israel's appalling human rights record - you certainly have not. You have consistently denied documented facts, which is a different thing altogether.
We have provided proof, of Sabra/Shatila - you denied it, chemical weapons - you denied it - massacres - you denied it - you denied it - illegal settlements- you denied it - systematic humiliation - you denied it - attempts to starve into submission- you denied it - - you denied it - slaughter of civilians, - you denied it - the destruction of homes, hospitals and schools, - you denied it - destroying the health of children and those in need of medicine...... and a whole host of human (or should I say inhuman) abuses - you denied them all, every single one. You have yet to provide evidence to show us wrong, YOU HAVE SIMPLY DENIED THEM - THAT IS NOT DISPUTING THEM, AND IT IS CERTAINLY NOT DISPROVING THEM
Just as with the Holocaust deniers, you are attempting to re-write history by simply saying that these documented facts are not true, that they, did not happen.
Typical is your insistence that the proposed sites the Bedouins are being moved onto are not toxic - YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN A LIST OF REASONS WHY IT IS WHICH YOU HAVE TOTALLY IGNORED AND GONE INTO YOUR MANTRA "IT IS NOT TOXIC" MODE - SHOW WHY THE REASONS YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN ARE WRONG OR STOP LYING - THE OPPORTUNITY IS YOURS
You obviously have no intention of explaining why the behaviour of others is an excuse for war crimes; nor do you intend to tell us why and when past massacres become irrelevant - tell us why these true or
STOP HIDING BEHIND SUCH EVASIVE DISHONESTY - IT IS YOUR NON-ARGUMENTS THAT ARE UNREASONABLE, IRRATIONAL OR NON EXISTANT
Jim Carroll