The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #149360   Message #3485709
Posted By: Jim Carroll
03-Mar-13 - 02:55 AM
Thread Name: BS: Israel condemned by UN
Subject: RE: BS: Israel condemned by UN
"Sorry, but I am putting Israel's case."
And those (just about everybody here) who oppose you have taken their information from everywhere - the U.N., Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the British, American, Israeli.... press, specific studies of Israel's built-in inequality (the Apartheid State), American, British and Jewish accounts of the massacre of refugees, Scientific Journals, Israeli's own health reports.... (just about anywhere's throughout the English-speaking world's)with a few translations thrown in.
You haven't attempted to disprove any of the evidence, you have rejected it out of hand as being prejudiced, 'antisemitic'; you have even rejected some evidence on the basis that it comes from the "antisemitic" Guardian purely on the the say-so of a site that declares in it's mission statement that it's role is to expose the "antisemitic nature of The Guardian".   
You are now insisting, by your constant reiterating that you are "putting Israel's case", that you are biased - you might have added that you are rejecting all evidence that doesn't come from Israel, which totally sums up the biased nature of your arguments.
That is the definition of "bias"; only taking into consideration one side of the argument.
By the way, you have claimed that you have not accused any of us of antisemitism.
By rejecting the evidence ("not worthy of consideration") put before you on the basis that it is biased and antisemitic, that is exactly what you are accusing everyone who is disgusted by Israel's human rights record of - antisemitism, or at the very least antisemitic dupes.
Your denial of lying appears to be 'lying about lying' - I trust we will soon be treated to you lying about lying about lying!
There's a whole list of examples if you want me to dig them, out - this forum's full of them; but your claim to have read all the links put forward, then passing a year old one as being "out-of-date", then being totally unaware of how many you have been given is being caught 'bang-to-rights - that's the problem with lying in public.   
Jim Carroll