"They provided illumination: YOU are stating it was to allow killing"
No - the witnesses stated that it did provide illumination for three nights of killing - eye witnesses, the only independent enquiry and the most comprehensive book on the massacre.
If you have any evidence to counter this, please provide it. If you dispute official reports and surveys it is your job to provide evidence to the contrary
Even by Israeli law, they were guilty of a war crime - see above.
"IF they were refugees, they had no right to weapons"
No weapons whatever weapons were found and at that stage of the massacre when the Israelis were demanding them they would have been disarming massacre victims so that they could not defend themselves - this was their intention.
"They turned them back, but can you show that they knew it was to be killed?"
All reports, including the only independent enquiry, says that they were made aware of what was happening withoin hours of the start of the massacre - see above.
"hey gave the use of ONE bulldozer to the militia"
That is the claim of the Israeli inquiry into itself - eye witness reports, including the two nurses, claim they saw bodies being bulldozed into the ground; this was also included in the only independent report.
"As culpable AS THE OCCUPYING POWER."
Nope - actually part of the massacre, even naming Begin as the main culprit
"As opposed to the Palestinians who selected their war criminals as a government?"
Even if there were true it is irrelevant - war crimes are not excusable because others carry them out - start a thread on PALESTINE
"See above."
Like you, Keith has refused to supply links or provide documented evidence to his claims - see above (the entire thread)
You bottled out of becoming involved in this part of the discussion once before NOW YOU ARE BEHAVING JUST LIKE KEITH AND MAKING UNLINKED AND UNQUALIFIED CLAIMS - TWO OF A KIND, AS THEY SAY IN CARDS - WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE FOR ALL THIS?
Jim Carroll