Keith vaccilates between Seigal seeing nothing and the next minute "she was on top of the hospital building and taking long walks, viewing it all"
You lie again.
You put in quotes what I never said.
Do you deny she reported what she saw that night from the top of the hospital?
Answer please.

His most disgusting rejection of eyewitness evidence was that of traumatised Israeli soldiers who were there - he describes them as "unreliable".
Why did they not come forward, like many of their comrades, until long after the events and the enquiries?

There were no such reports - produce them if there were - otherwise you are lying again
The militia took casualties.
Siegel reports sounds of fighting.
If there were none, they were thought to be present.

Bloody nonsense - there was no street lighting Witnesses, including Ellen Seigal described it as being "as light as day"
You do not need flares or street lights to kill indiscriminately in a crowded camp.
Siegel said it was silent under the flares, except for "light artillery."
Deny that Jim?

The fighters had left long ago - none were found, there was no armed reesistance
Evidence Jim?
I have given you mine.
Anyway, they were thought to be there if they were not.

Your ludicrous, lurid accusations are believed by no-one outside your bunch of bigots in your bubble of lies.
Ireland, Australia and Denmark and every other decent nation would have no truck, never mind close and warm relations with a state guilty of such things.