Jack, I didn't lie intentionally if you can call it that. I apologized to you for reacting to the post that I didn't read. I admit that I reacted without thinking carefully but I don't call that lying.

I reacted because of the finger pointing that you did to Dawkins who is an intelligent, moral human being, with an investigative mind, a true scientist and to throw all those epithets at him without some kind of reaction from those who admire him is unreasonable.

You can close the door to dialogue, that is your prerogative.

If you want to criticize Dawkin's ideas, that's one thing, assuming you have read any of his works but to personalize everything as an attack on you is silly.

I won't get into a bar fight with you.