""So far you ask us to believe so called eye witnesses when numerous cases of blatant lying make them highly equivocal.""

That is a lie!

We ask you to consider the evidence of eye witnesses, not "so-called", that is the epithet you apply to those people, without evidence, so that you can make an entirely unsupported assessment (with the emphasis on the ass) as liars.

You have never, so that we might see for ourselves, linked to their ""numerous cases of blatant lying"", which of course, as Jim repeatedly points out are mostly made up by you.

We give you accredited sources! You paint them antisemitic.
We give you documented eye witness accounts! You paint them liars.
We give you Israeli witnesses! You ignore them.

And you have predictably, boringly and futilely just done the same again.

Must try harder.

Don T.