Don,


Try reading posts. You only have shown the you did not bother to read my post of Date: 01 Apr 13 - 08:34 AM



"though the proportion has not been, and probably won't be, quantified, "


Yet ALL efforts have been to reduce that portion, and NONE have been made to deal with the FACT of climate change happening WHETHER we reduce CO2 or not.

As I said...



Date: 01 Apr 13 - 08:34 AM

The question I have put forward, and been attacked for, is that we do NOT know if man-made effects are the TOTAL cause for GW. IF we remove the man-made effects, at great cost and risk of social upheaval, and the remaining causes of global warning are STILL sufficient to cause the damage predicted, WILL IT HAVE BEEN WORTH THE COST?

It seems that it is forbidden to talk about this, just as ALL proposed actions by the GW Front are to REDUCE the man-made effects , and NOT to deal with the consequences of the warming itself. THAT would be worthwhile.

When I am informed how man-made causes are melting the icecaps on Mars, and changing the weather patterns on Jupiter, perhaps then I would be less concerned about ACTUAL global warming and more about what steps we can take to prestend it is not going to happen.