""Yes I have.
I linked to reports of the faked massacre at Jenin, with all the eye witness accounts revealed to be blatant lies told by Israel's enemies for political purpose.
We have Stringsinger's lies in his OP.
I have previously provided evidence that no bodies were thrown off the Marmara, despite all the lying eye witnesses including nurses who reported it.
There have been faked casualties, a faked killing on the gaza border, and on and on.""

OK, Three instances.

Vague claims without detail don't add anything and ""on and on"" is nonsense.

You have three instances I can concede, and from those you extrapolate that no eye witness can be considered credible, and all must be lying.

The police forces of the World will be devastated when they hear that they've got to release all those criminals convicted on eye witness testimony.

You see Keith, that's what happens when you extrapolate from a stupid premise.

Logically you cannot, because one, or one hundred witnesses have turned out to be part of a conspiracy, simply dismiss witnesses entirely without examination of their individual evidence.

Nor can you separate witnesses into groups by whom they witness against.

The group with evidence damaging to Israel is no more, or less, likely to be truthful than any other group.

So, logic demands that you examine their evidence and attempt to check its veracity, rather than dismiss it out of hand as "lies", "anti Israel", or "antsemitic".

This you have not done at any time in this discussion.

Don T.