i suppose it depends on how "attack anothers belief" is defined.if not believing that anothers position is correct and true,then the whole spectrum of posters,or near all of us,are "attacking" anothers beliefs.if on the other hand it is more narrowly defined as verbal abuse,mockery,belittling,accusations of lying of persons, etc,i suspect that a detailed survey of posts would confirm ron davis opinion,an opinion he ventured without any of the negative traits outlined above.