"It is ok to destroy just part of a site, I guess. "

I didn't say that but the article you posted did say this. "we promise that the location will be limitedly used without harming it at all."

So it is Sharona of the Blaze vs the Gaza tourism minister. She said vs He said. Except the Gaza tourism minister is actually in Gaza. We can all decide for ourselves who is more credible.


>>>Now, for your comments about the titles of threads on Israel????

Can I depend on you to remember to correct the next thread that states "Israel bombs Gaza" and insist on "Israel bombs part of Gaza"??<<<

Come on Bruce. "Bombs" does not imply totality. If they say "Israel Destroys Gaza" It would mean an entirely different thing than "Israel Bombs Gaza." and either scenario would be far worse than taking a bulldozer to a historic site on their own land. Just as "Hamas rockets destroy Israeli village" would be worse than "rockets fired at Israeli village"