You repeat and defend Christianity. So... are you with the criminals if I am with Dawkins?

That's the problem when assertive people feel they are threatened by lack of belief. The arguments they are advised to use by, in Jack's case Betty Swollocks, rely on seeing atheism as a threat so you have to find someone who has a high public profile and say anybody who is irreligious is a follower of them.

Pathetic.

First, if Christianity is worth a jot, cultists wouldn't need to attack lack of faith as being a rival cult. Here in The UK we have people going to court to ask for legal support for their bigotry and then claiming persecution when the courts refuse to acknowledge that law breaking is okay if the Bible allows it.

Second, most decent Christian people I know would feel embarrassed by people like you who use their Bible as a weapon. You claim, I suppose, to have been a sailor? Well did you open your eyes on your travels? The rest of the Western world isn't based on Dumbfuckistan principles. I thought you may have found that in Canada but maybe not.