"everyday laws of physics" steve? despite ploughing through an admittedly difficult article on wiki about chemical evolution it was apparent to me that despite numerous models, pasteurs confidence in his work finally discounting abiogenesis remains well founded.maybe you can do better steve?
and while you are about it demonstrate the needed increase in information supposedly arising from mutations.last i heard loss and reshuffling are about the sum of it. maybe you can do better than dawkins who was stumped by the question,eventually only giving an evasive answer.
after that you can tell me again that there is no evidence for a maker and designer?.

john-psalm 14 v 1