still evading the question steve.
just asserting that dawkins does answer it on other videos is not exactly evidence that he does.
or that you can.
if "evolution is true" and is testable,verifiable science surely a few examples relating to the question should be no problem steve.
alternatively an admission that there are no known examples will suffice - though it would highlight the faith factor of darwinism !.

thanks for clarifying joe.the only atheist that has been consistently civil [at least to me] is bill.my failings relate to grammtical errors and not agreeing but not to using insulting language.except that the disagreement is taken as insulting,by some!