well musket you no doubt are referring to creationism when you talk of myth.apart from the parts of evolutio such as natural selection and mutations and other science that can be verified by observable,repeatable,testable means,and also is affirmed by creationists,i believe darwinism is a myth.though it has different denominations the bedrock of darwinism is not subject to testing.
if you think it is,you might like to tackle the questions dawkins and steve evaded.
joe - everyone has their presuppositions that colour their research.as i indicated to musket darwinism is his presupposition,,and yours also it seems.the creationist admits to his starting point and of course that effects his research.are you aware that there are a lot of creationist scientists and general darwin doubters.
as much as i respect your theology degree,i find it sad that you believe,at least historically that it is untrustworthy.
maybe the devil made you di it!