LOL! I dont think i have quoted the bible for a long time and blow me down ,steve does!
if steve wants to insist that evolution is true ,it is a meaningless statement if he cannot demonstrate it.
and whatever he does come up with - if anything - needs to be evidence that excludes an alternative explanation which might be offered from a creationist perpective.
as he claims i have not presented any evidence that supports creationism,yet conveniently forgets my recent challenges ,- i will move on.
mind you i would prefer to talk in terms of discussion rather than confrontation.
what would be your take on polystrate trees?the creationist position would be that the different strata were laid down in flood conditions quite quikly and therefore prevented decay.how do evolutionists account for the non decay over the supposed millenia between strata.
i have no doubt you have an answer and i would be interested to know the darwinist take on this.
maybe we can discuss one thing at a time rather than toss meaningless mantras around.