Demonstrate more clearly where the inaccuracy lies, please then Richard: by citing the version Don claimed to be responding to with accusations of 'misquotation', and what you asseverate to be the correct quotation; and I will endeavour to respond if significant differences do indeed appear, which could not be accounted for by simple variations in the verbal options of the translators.

Till then: no comment.

Why, btw, have you chosen to respond on Don's behalf when he has not himself seen fit to do so? Will he welcome this interpolation of yours, do you think?

~M~