""Subject: RE: BS: Unarmed soldier killed, Woolwich (London)
From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 29 May 13 - 12:55 PM

Why not Keith - you get away with it
An individual like me might believably be deranged, but you can not dismiss a vast global movement as all afflicted.
You would have to be, er, a nutter Jim.

They are acting on deeply held religious belief.
They believe they are doing the will of Allah, and expect to be rewarded by Allah.""

So, in this post, you are saying that the whole of global Islam is terrorist out of ""deeply held religious belief"", not just the tiny minority of radicalised nutters.

________________________________________________________________

""Subject: RE: BS: Unarmed soldier killed, Woolwich (London)
From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 29 May 13 - 04:08 PM


Are you claiming that all Muslims are terrorists
No.
- or are you claiming that active Muslim organisations are only involved in what they do because of religious conviction.
No.

Am I claiming that active Islamist organisations are only involved in what they do because of religious conviction?
Yes. They say so.
Why should we heed you and ignore them Jim?""

And in this post you have denied claiming that all Muslims are terrorists, and in answer to the second question, you have responded "No", and also "Yes. They say so".

Apart from the fact that your posts reek of anti Muslim sentiment and the concept that Muslim = Evil, do you really have the slightest idea of what you are actually claiming?

It doesn't appear so!

Don T.