This all boils down to what is "evidence"...

Let's say that Sallie got pregnant in high school by one of the football players and ended up getting an abortion...

Ten years later she is raped by someone else...

Should the high school incident be admissible "evidence" that she deserved to be raped???

So back to Martin...

Will either of you tell me why you think that pictures on Martin's cell phone that were taken prior to his murder that had NOTHING to do with his murder is "evidence" in the case???

I mean, "evidence" is about the facts surrounding a crime... It's not a fishing expedition thru a victim's past life...

I disagree with both of you... And I trust that any reasonable judge will tell Zimmerman's lawyer to stick with the case at hand...

This "discovery" is way beyond the any sane interpretation of "evidence"...

B~