Steve Shaw
What "version of science"??
Your version in which you say "Evolution is true" even though you say science cannot prove it to be so.
Your version in which you say "Evolution is true" (even a "great truth") and yet you have just said on the other thread that it isn't dogma.
Your version in which you say that a theory can be declared true by the weight of evidence. This is a philosophy of science called Logical Positivism that was discredited forty years or more ago.
Your version in which you brush aside the the idea of falsifiability despite the fact that it is basic orthodoxy in modern scientific thinking.

Respond over there, and, if it's of any interest, I'll be right with you.

Actually, Steve, I am waiting for you to respond. I have already asked you to do so on the other thread and you ignored my request. I have asked you here and, again, nothing but evasion.