Simple question - if the Islamic religion is as you describe it:
"the patent lesson that Islam should never have been allowed a foothold here to preach its poisonous [and filthy-mannered] doctrine that, now they are here & have taken over some of our cities [Luton; Bradford...], we have got to change all our ways to accommodate their filthy fatuous ideas"
why aren't the streets of Britain running with rivers of blood - why aren't all the adherents to that "poisonous doctrine" out on the streets with machetes slaughtering every non-believer they can lay hands on?
Is is, as Keith would have us believe of the "culturally implanted tendency" to rape underage girls, that these believers for some reason or another resist the pressures of that "poisonous [and filthy-mannered] doctrine".
This is the picture you pair have chosen to project of Muslim people in Britain - not an attack on "Islamism" as you dishonestly claim, but the religion itself and all who adhere to it.
That is what you wrote and all the snidy name calling does not absolve you from that shitty piece of bilious hatred
Jim Carroll