Sciencegeek: "..if there is a bad bill signed... it came from Congress, so maybe we should try to find a few honest politicians to vote for... anyone have a lantern?"

If you read carefully, this 'bill' was signed by the President, and attached to his Democrat budget, to be submitted.

My question is that it didn't make sense, being as with the results NOT in, of any findings, from any studies, how could the president submit this rider in his budget, amidst petitions NOT to, which exempts Monsanto, in particular, from any liabilities, to health or the environment....after he just rammed through the 'Affordable Healthcare Act', commonly refereed to as Obamacare, supposedly looking out for our health. What is it that he is overlooking?..Our health??..The budget??..or the land use, which small farms are being squeezed out, by Monsanto, AND provisions under the 'Patriot Act'..written by Biden, in 1995???

Now somehow, gnu, who re-started this thread, apparently to get people concerned about GMOs, either wasn't aware of this..(though I posted a post about it weeks ago(before it was chic), or he thinks that GMOs and the President, willfully sidestepping anything to protect the public from them, and instead is seeking to protect Monsanto's financial concerns, and allow the Trillions of dollars in damages, is NOT relevant to his thread.
You'd THINK(rare commodity), that this doesn't make sense...though it does, but just not to the context of which he was intending.
So, let's just sit back, and see what the 'so-called liberal' Democrats have to say, to explain this away!!!
...and hopefully we won't have to wade through too many nasty spirited, diversionary posts to find out!

GfS